Relevansi Alat Bukti Dalam Pemeriksaan Praperadilan Terhadap Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30652/tfgzwk65Keywords:
Due process of law, Human Rights, Suspect DeterminationAbstract
Article 90 paragraph (1) of the Law Number 20 of 2025 on Criminal Procuedural Law (CPC) Regarding the pre-trial proceeding, Article 2(2) of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016 limits the pre-trial proceedings competence in such a way that judges shall only examine the formal aspect of a person’s suspect determination legitimacy which refers to the minimum quantity of 2 valid evidences and shall not examine the material aspect of any cases. Until the CPC came into forece, the Supreme Court Regulatin is still in force. Such limitation is an incoherence with the principles of due process of law and human rights protection. Neither it coheres with the concept of suspect determination itself. This research is conducted in order to analyze the incoherence of Article 2(2) of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016 with the principles of due process of law and human rights protection and the concept of suspect determination. This research is conducted by using the normative research method. The novelty of this research is a proposition that Article 2(2) of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016 shall be set aside by the pre-trial judges in examining the relevancy of evidences as the basis of suspect determination. Furthermore, it is necessary to clearly stipulate the obligation of pre-trial judges to examine the relevancy of evidence as the basis of suspect determination.
References
Buku
Edwards, Bradley D., and Lawrence F. Travis III, Introduction to Criminal Justice. New York: Routledge, 2024.
Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Teori & Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.
Hodgson, Jacqueline S. The Metamorphosis pf Criminal Justice: A Comparative Account. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Kadir, Abdul. Pengantar Restorative Justice: Fungsi Kejaksaan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2022.
McGourlay, Claire, Mark Thomas, and Suzanne Gower, Evidence: Law and Context. New York: Routledge, 2024.
Purwoleksono, Didik Endro. Hukum Acara Pidana. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2015.
Rahayu, Derita Prapti, dan Sulaiman. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2020.
Bambang Slamet Riyadi. Culture of Abuse of Power in Indonesia From the Perspective of Criminology and Law. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.
Nemeth, Charles P. Law and Evidence: A Primer for Criminal Justice, Criminology, and Legal Studies. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2023.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Penelitian Hukum: Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2019
Saputra, Rio, Lufsiana, dan Dharma Setiawan Negara. Reformasi Hukum Acara Pidana: Menyongsong KUHAP Baru. Tasikmalaya: Langgam Pustaka, 2025.
Satria, Hariman. Hukum Pembuktian Pidana Esensi dan Teori. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2022.
Suadi, Amran. Filsafat Hukum: Refleksi Filsafat Pancasila, Hak asasi Manusia, dan Etika. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
Takariawan, Agus. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: Pusaka Reka Cipta, 2021.
E-Jurnal
Ansori, Lutfil. “Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif”, Jurnal Yuridis 4, no. 2 (2017): 148-163. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i2.244
Aviram, Hadar. “Packer in Context : Formalism and Fairness in the Due Process Model” Law & Social Inquiry 36, no. 1 (2011): 237-261. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011876.
Barnett, Randy E, and Evan D. Bernick, “No Arbitrary Power: An Originalist Theory of the Due Process of Law” William & Mary Law Review 60, no. 5 (2019): 1599-1683. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol60/iss5/2
Calo, Zachary R. “Catholic Social Thought and Human Rights”, The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 74, no. 1 (2015); 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12088
Epps, Daniel. “The Consequences of Error in Criminal Justice”. Harvard Law Review 128, no. 4 (2015): 1067-1151. https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-128/the-consequences-of-error-in-criminal-justice/
Iswantoro, Wahyu. “Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim dan Implikasi Terhadap Perkembangan Praperadilan”, Majalah Hukum Nasional 48, no. 1 (2018): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v48i1.112
Leider, Robert. “The Modern Common Law of Crime”, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 111, no. 2 (2021): 407-499. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol111/iss2/2
Marbun, Rocky. “Trikotomi Relasi dalam Penetapan Tersangka: Menguji Frasa ‘Pemeriksaan Calon Tersangka’ Melalui Praperadilan”, Undang: Jurnal Hukum 4, no.1 (2021): 159-190. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.1.159-190.
Moningka, Paul Eliezer Tuama. “Praperadilan Sebagai Mekanisme Kontrol Terhadap Tindakan Penyidik Dalam Menetapkan Tersangka Menurut Putusan MK Nomor: 21/PUU-XII/2014”. Lex Crimen 6, no. 6 (2017): 5-13. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/16948.
Muhaimin. “Keberadaan Hakim Komisaris dan Transparansi Dalam Proses Penyidikan”. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 16, no. 2 (2016): 215-230. DOI:10.30641/DEJURE.2016.V16.215-230
Muntaha, “Pengaturan Praperadilan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 29, no. 3 (2017): 463-473. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.22318
Nurkomalawati, Agustiana, dan Pujiyono, Due Process of Law as Part of Political Law Enforcement”. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 6, no. 6 (2023): 505-516 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i6.1415.
Packer, Herbert L. “Two Models of the Criminal Process”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 113, no. 1 (1964): 1-68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3310562.
Pevnick, Ryan. “Should Civil Liberties Have Strict Priority?”. Law and Philosophy 34, no. 5 (2015): 519-549. DOI: 10.1007/s10982-015-9233-1
Rokilah, “Dinamika Negara Hukum Indonesia: Antara Rechtsstaat dan Rule Of Law”. Nurani Hukum 2, no. 1 (2019): 12-22. https://doi.org/10.51825/nhk.v2i1.8167.
Sasan, John Michael V. “The Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative Analysis”, Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities 9, no. 1 (2021): 34-45. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v9i1.4042.
Simonson, Jocelyn. "The Place of "the People" in Criminal Procedure". Columbia Law Review 119, no.1 (2019): 249-308. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26559622
Situmorang, Mosgan. “Kedudukan Hakim Komisaris Dalam RUU Hukum Acara Pidana”. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18, no. 4 (2018): 433-444. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.433-444.
Skorupka, Jerzy. “The Rule of Admissibility of Evidence in the Criminal Process of Continental Europe”. Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal 7, no. 1 (2021): 93-122. https://doi.org/10.22197/RBDPP.V7I1.526.
Vermeule, Adrian. “Deference and Due Process”. Harvard Law Review 129, no. 7 (2016): 1890-1931. https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-129/deference-and-due-process/
Yarulin, Ildus, and Evgeny Pozdyakov “Are Universal Human Rights Universal?”, Politeija 18, no. 2 (2021): 67-77 https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.71.03
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sapta Aprilianto, Darryl Evan Brouwer, Lolita Fitriyana (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license allows others to share and adapt your work, but only for non-commercial purposes and under the condition that they credit you and license their new creations under the same terms.
