Analisis Yuridis terhadap Peran Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dalam Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia

Authors

  • MAULIDINA SARI UNIVERSITAS JAMBI Author
  • AVECIENA YOE UNIVERSITAS JAMBI Author
  • Windarto UNIVERSITAS JAMBI Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.9.1.41-57

Keywords:

Consumer Protection; Dispute Resolution; Institutional Effectiveness; Legal Access; Regulatory Reform

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the performance of non-judicial consumer dispute resolution institutions in fulfilling their role as protectors of consumer rights, particularly in light of the growing complexity of contemporary commercial transactions and the proliferation of sector-specific dispute resolution forums. The primary focus of this study is to assess the extent to which these institutions are capable of delivering legal protection that is effective, expedient, and accessible, despite facing various structural and functional limitations such as unclear jurisdictional boundaries, overlapping mandates with other bodies, and weak institutional infrastructure. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, employing doctrinal legal analysis and the examination of relevant case decisions. The findings reveal that, structurally, these institutions continue to encounter fundamental challenges, including the limited binding effect of their decisions, which remain subject to judicial review, the lack of regulatory coherence, and insufficient institutional capacity particularly in addressing disputes arising from digital transactions and financial services. The absence of a uniform national procedural standard further contributes to inconsistencies in implementation across regions. This study underscores the urgent need to strengthen the institutional role through the harmonization of sectoral regulations, restructuring of institutional authority, and the development of an integrated digital complaint system. These findings are expected to contribute to the formulation of institutional policy frameworks that are more adaptive and effective in responding to the evolving challenges of consumer protection.

References

Abib, A. Heru Nuswanto Agus Saiful, Doddy Kridasaksana. “Penerapan Klausula Baku Dalam Melindungi Konsumen Pada Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui E-Commerce”. Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya 17, no. 1 (2015): 122–36, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v17i1.508.

Badan Perlindungan Konsumen Nasional Republik Indonesia,=, “BPKN RI Paparkan Catatan Akhir Tahun 2024, Terima 1733 Pengaduan Selama Tahun 2024,” n.d., https://bpkn.go.id/beritaterkini/detail/bpkn-ri-paparkan-catatan-akhir-tahun-2024-terima-1733-pengaduan-selama-tahun-2024.

Badan Perlindungan Konsumen Nasional Republik Indonesia. “Catatan Akhir Tahun 2024, Evaluasi Dan Kinerja BPKN RI Dalam Pengembangan Perlindungan Konsumen,” n.d., https://www.bpkn.go.id/beritaterkini/detail/catatan-akhir-tahun-2024-evaluasi-dan-kinerja-bpkn-ri-dalam-pengembangan-perlindungan-konsumen.

Badan Perlindungan Konsumen Nasional Republik Indonesia. “Catatan Akhir Tahun BPKN RI: Pemulihan Hak Konsumen Meningkat, Literasi Masih Jadi Tantangan,” n.d., https://bpkn.go.id/beritaterkini/detail/catatan-akhir-tahun-bpkn-ri-pemulihan-hak-konsumen-meningkat-literasi-masih-jadi-tantangan.

Badan Perlindungan Konsumen Nasional Republik Indonesia. “Kinerja BPKN Semester I Di 2024 Terus Berkomitmen Lindungi Hak-Hak Konsumen,” n.d., https://bpkn.go.id/beritaterkini/detail/kinerja-bpkn-semester-i-di-2024-terus-berkomitmen-lindungi-hak-hak-konsumen.

BPKN-RI. “Statistik Pengaduan | Badan Perlindungan Konsumen Nasional (BPKN),” accessed March 19, 2025, https://bpkn.go.id/statistik_pengaduan.

Brahmana, Herman, et al. “Peranan BPSK Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Penjualan Melalui E-Commerce Kota Medan.” Junral Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora, Dan Politik 5, no. 3 (2025): 2487–92, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.

Chaerani, Febriana Marwah. “Konsep Cyber Notary Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Konsumen Pada Electronic Commerce” (2024), https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/82591.

Detik Finance. “BPKN Terima 1.802 Aduan Konsumen, Total Kerugian Rp 443 M,” n.d., https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-7820037/bpkn-terima-1-802-aduan-konsumen-total-kerugian-rp-443-m.

Diantha, I Made Pasek. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum (Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2016).

Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Putusan PN CIBINONG 389/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020/PN Cbi,” n.d., https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaebf9b36bfc4c2ea827313531373337.html.

Ditjen PKTN. “Diseminasi Hasil Survei Indeks Keberdayaan Konsumen Tahun 2024,” n.d., https://ditjenpktn.kemendag.go.id/berita/diseminasi-hasil-survei-indeks-keberdayaan-konsumen-tahun-2024.

Handayani, Fitri, dan Nuryah Fatqul Jannah Harin Adie Tama. “Optimalisasi Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembiayaan Konsumen”. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 2, no. 4 (2021): 309–28, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v2i4.48.

Handy, Markoni. “Kepastian Hukum Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Terhadap Nasabah Perbankan (Studi KasusPutusan Pengadilan Negeri Cibinong Nomor: 389/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2020/PN.Cbi)”. Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora (AJSH) 4, no. 3 (2024): 1172–82, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v4i3.634.

Hulman, Panjaitan. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen:Reposisi Dan Penguatan Kelembagaan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Dan Menjamin Keseimbangan Dengan Pelaku Usaha, Ed. Hojot Marluga, Jala Permata Aksara, Cetakan Pertama (Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara, 2021).

Info Bank News. “Indeks Literasi Dan Inklusi Keuangan Masyarakat Naik Di 2025, Ini Buktinya!,” n.d., https://infobanknews.com/indeks-literasi-dan-inklusi-keuangan-masyarakat-naik-di-2025-ini-buktinya/#google_vignette.

Jayanto, J. and J. N. Saly. “Efektivitas Putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Bersifat Final Dan Mengikat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Karawang Nomor 45/Pdt. Sus-Bpsk/2022/Pn Kwg)”. Jurnal Hukum Adigama 5, no. 2 (2022): 758–76, https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/adigama/article/view/21850.

Maharani, Alfina, and Adnand Darya Dzikra. “Fungsi Perlindungan Konsumen Dan Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Konsumen Di Indonesia : Perlindungan, Konsumen Dan Pelaku Usaha (Literature Review)”. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi 2, no. 6 (2021): 659–66, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/jemsi.v2i6.607.

Manek, Andryawan Andryawan Meylane Carmelia. “Kendala Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Bpsk) Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Konsumen,” Jurnal Serina Sosial Humaniora 1, no. 2 (2023): 178–84, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/jssh.v1i2.27824.

Media Center. “Hingga Oktober 2024, BPSK Kota Banjarmasin Telah Selesaikan 7 Kasus,” n.d., https://diskominfomc.kalselprov.go.id/2024/10/17/hingga-oktober-2024-bpsk-kota-banjarmasin-telah-selesaikan-7-kasus/.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Bandar Maju, 2008).

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006).

Rimanda, Rahmi. “Keberadaan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Sebagai Lembaga Quasi Yudisial Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 17–34, https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v4n1.2.

Shofie, Yusuf. “Optimalisasi Peran Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Bpsk) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembiayaan Konsumen Di Tengah Terjadinya Disharmonisasi Pengaturan”. ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (2013): 49–85, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v4i1.28.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013).

Tajhi, Ahmad Irham, et al. “Kewenangan BPSK Dan BMAI Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Asuransi Antara Perusahaan Asuransi Dan Pemegang Polis Asuransi (Studi Putusan PN Lubuk Linggau Nomor 17/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2021/PN Llg),” Future Academia : The Journal of Multidisciplinary Research on Scientific and Advanced 2, no. 4 (2024): 847–57, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61579/future.v2i4.218.

Tempo. “4.855 Konsumen Mengadu Ke Kemendag Soal E-Commerce”. 2021. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/4-855-konsumen-mengadu-ke-kemendag-soal-e-commerce-apa-saja-yang-dipersoalkan--491730.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-24

How to Cite

Analisis Yuridis terhadap Peran Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen dalam Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. (2025). Riau Law Journal, 9(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.9.1.41-57