Kepastian Hukum Pembatalan Akta Notariil Menjadi Akta di Bawah Tangan Pada Perjanjian Kerjasama

Authors

  • Arya Putra Rizal Pratama Universitas Airlangga Author
  • Moch.Takim Universitas Airlangga Author
  • Rifkah Romizah Universitas Airlangga Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.6.2.287-305

Keywords:

Contract, Cancellation, Abuse of Circumtance

Abstract

Wiralogam Company with Citi9 Property Indonesia made an Operational Cooperation Agreement (KSO) for the development of the Tenaru 9 Project. Where in this agreement Wiralogam Company made a loan of IDR. 12.000.000.000,00 (two billion rupiah) to Citi9 Property Company Indonesia through the Notarial Deed of Agreement. However, there was a legal dispute where the owner of Wiralogam without the knowledge of the occurrence of retroactive notarial deed becomes under the hand. This resulted in alleged losses in which Wiralogam Company borrowed money with collateral in the form of land and shop houses covering an area of 20,450m2 (square) and it was as if the cancellation of the cooperation agreement was under the pretext of PT. Wiralogam failed to repay the debt based on what was agreed. This study uses legal research methodswitha statutory approach (status approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and case approach (case approach). The results of this study explain that the application of the agreement under the hands and the date back without the knowledge of Wiralogam Company is an unlawful act on a contract which is contrary to the freedom to contract based on good faith as regulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) BW. However, the legal protection that must be carried out by PT. Wiralogam as the aggrieved party is to unilaterally cancel through the court on the basis of fundamental losses. Therefore, after the cancellation, a lawsuit against the law must be carried out on the contract as well as abuse of circumstances based on defects of will and deception on the basis of Article 1321 BW

References

Aman, Chairul. “Analisis Hukum Tentang Akta Pengakuan Utang Yang Diikuti Kuasa

Menjual Dengan Jaminan Hak Atas Tanah”. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan. Vol. 9

Nomor 1 (2022): 1-12 https://ejurnal.stih-painan.ac.id/index.php/jihk/issue/view/22.

Andini, Pratiwi Puspitho dan Muhammad Farhan Alwiqori. “Perlindungan Konsumen

Melalui Pemenuhan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Penggunaan Angkutan

Umum Bus Antar Kota”. Riau Law Journal. Volume 6 Nomor 1 (2022): 135-159

http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v6i1.7934.

Atiyah, P.S. Promises, Morals and Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1981

https://www.jstor.org/stable/1288412.

Budiono, Harlien. Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian & Penerapannya di Bidang

Kenotariatan. Bandung: Cita Aditya 2010.

Curzon, L.B. Equity. London: MacDonald & Evans Ltd , 1967.

Gaol, Selamat Lumban.“Kedudukan Akra Notaris Sebagai Akta Di Bawah Tangan

Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris”.Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Digantara.

Vol. 8 Nomor 2.(2018): 91-107, https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v8i2.257.

Gultom, Hamonangan Justinus dan Erna Susilawaty Sebayang.” Aspek Hukum Akra

Pengakuan Hutang Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Konsumtif”. Jurnal Ilmiah Skylandsea.

Volume 2 No.1 (2018):83-92.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Segi-segi Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni Bandung, 1992.

Hartkamp, Arthur S. and Marianne M.M. Tillema. Contract law in the Netherlands.The

Hague : Routledge, 1995.

Hasanudin, “Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Sebagai Alasan Pembatalan Perjanjian”, pntilamuta.

go.id, 18 Mei 2016, https://pn-tilamuta.go.id/2016/05/18/penyalahgunaankeadaan-

sebagai-alasan-pembatalan-perjanjian/.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha. “Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak

Komersial”. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group 2021.

Ismi, Hayatul “Beberapa Pemikiran Hukum Dalam Menyikapi Positivisme Hukum”. Riau

Law Journal. Volume 1 Nomor 1(2017):15-30

http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v1i1.4181.

Manery, Barnabas Dumas “Makna dan Fungsi Itikad Baik Dalam Kontrak Kerja

Konstruksi”.Jurnal Sasi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura,Vol.23 Nomor 2

(2017):137-140 https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v23i2.101

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta:Prenada Media 2010.

Nurjannah, Aminuddin Ilmar, Zulkifli Aspan, “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Keputusan Majelis

Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Pemeriksaan Notaris”.Riau Law Journal. Volume 2

Nomor 2 (2018):173-186, http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v2i2.5965.

Pahlefi, Rafles dan Herlina Manik, “Klausula Pembatalan Sepihak Dalam Perjanjian

Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia”, Gorontalo Law Review Vol.2

Nomor 2 (2019): 72-80, https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v2i2.702.

Pangestu, Yogi Aditya “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pembatalan Perjanjian Pengangkutan

Sampah Antara PT. Multi Inti Guna Dengan Dinas Kebersihan Dan Pertamanan Kota

Pekanbaru Dalam Perkara No.252 PDT./2016/PN.PBR”, (Skripsi, 2019).

Siombo, Marhaeni Ria dan Nada Davinia Christalya. “Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum

Karena Pembatalan Perjanjian Dalam Sengketa Tanah”.Jurnal Paradigma Hukum.

Vol.7 Nomor 1 (2022): 114-131, https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v7i1.3206

Sopamena, Ronald Fadly.“Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian”, Jurnal

Batulis Civil Law Review. Vol.2 Nomor 1 (2021):1-15

https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.451.

Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta:Intermasa, 1982.

Sudikno. Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Liberty, 2008.

Sumriyah.“Cacat Kehendak (Wilsgebreken)Sebagai Upaya Pembatalan Perjanjian Dalam

Perspektif Hukum Perdata”. Jurnal Simposium Hukum. Vol.1 Nomor 1 (2019):663-

667.

Suryodiningrat, R.M. Asas-asas Hukum Perikatan. Bandung:Tarsito 1985.

Suyanto dan Ayu Sulistiya Ningsih, “Pembatalan Perjanjian Sepihak Menurut Pasal 1320

Ayat (1) KUH.Perdata Tentang Kata Sepakat Sebagai Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian”.

Jurnal Pro Hukum. Vol.7. Nomor 2 (2018): 1-12,

https://doi.org/10.55129/jph.v7i2.702

Downloads

Published

2022-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kepastian Hukum Pembatalan Akta Notariil Menjadi Akta di Bawah Tangan Pada Perjanjian Kerjasama. (2022). Riau Law Journal, 6(2), 287-305. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.6.2.287-305