Kepastian Hukum Pembatalan Akta Notariil Menjadi Akta di Bawah Tangan Pada Perjanjian Kerjasama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.6.2.287-305Keywords:
Contract, Cancellation, Abuse of CircumtanceAbstract
Wiralogam Company with Citi9 Property Indonesia made an Operational Cooperation Agreement (KSO) for the development of the Tenaru 9 Project. Where in this agreement Wiralogam Company made a loan of IDR. 12.000.000.000,00 (two billion rupiah) to Citi9 Property Company Indonesia through the Notarial Deed of Agreement. However, there was a legal dispute where the owner of Wiralogam without the knowledge of the occurrence of retroactive notarial deed becomes under the hand. This resulted in alleged losses in which Wiralogam Company borrowed money with collateral in the form of land and shop houses covering an area of 20,450m2 (square) and it was as if the cancellation of the cooperation agreement was under the pretext of PT. Wiralogam failed to repay the debt based on what was agreed. This study uses legal research methodswitha statutory approach (status approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and case approach (case approach). The results of this study explain that the application of the agreement under the hands and the date back without the knowledge of Wiralogam Company is an unlawful act on a contract which is contrary to the freedom to contract based on good faith as regulated in Article 1338 paragraph (3) BW. However, the legal protection that must be carried out by PT. Wiralogam as the aggrieved party is to unilaterally cancel through the court on the basis of fundamental losses. Therefore, after the cancellation, a lawsuit against the law must be carried out on the contract as well as abuse of circumstances based on defects of will and deception on the basis of Article 1321 BW
References
Aman, Chairul. “Analisis Hukum Tentang Akta Pengakuan Utang Yang Diikuti Kuasa
Menjual Dengan Jaminan Hak Atas Tanah”. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan. Vol. 9
Nomor 1 (2022): 1-12 https://ejurnal.stih-painan.ac.id/index.php/jihk/issue/view/22.
Andini, Pratiwi Puspitho dan Muhammad Farhan Alwiqori. “Perlindungan Konsumen
Melalui Pemenuhan Hak Penyandang Disabilitas Dalam Penggunaan Angkutan
Umum Bus Antar Kota”. Riau Law Journal. Volume 6 Nomor 1 (2022): 135-159
http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v6i1.7934.
Atiyah, P.S. Promises, Morals and Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1981
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1288412.
Budiono, Harlien. Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian & Penerapannya di Bidang
Kenotariatan. Bandung: Cita Aditya 2010.
Curzon, L.B. Equity. London: MacDonald & Evans Ltd , 1967.
Gaol, Selamat Lumban.“Kedudukan Akra Notaris Sebagai Akta Di Bawah Tangan
Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris”.Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Digantara.
Vol. 8 Nomor 2.(2018): 91-107, https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v8i2.257.
Gultom, Hamonangan Justinus dan Erna Susilawaty Sebayang.” Aspek Hukum Akra
Pengakuan Hutang Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Konsumtif”. Jurnal Ilmiah Skylandsea.
Volume 2 No.1 (2018):83-92.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Segi-segi Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni Bandung, 1992.
Hartkamp, Arthur S. and Marianne M.M. Tillema. Contract law in the Netherlands.The
Hague : Routledge, 1995.
Hasanudin, “Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Sebagai Alasan Pembatalan Perjanjian”, pntilamuta.
go.id, 18 Mei 2016, https://pn-tilamuta.go.id/2016/05/18/penyalahgunaankeadaan-
sebagai-alasan-pembatalan-perjanjian/.
Hernoko, Agus Yudha. “Hukum Perjanjian: Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak
Komersial”. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group 2021.
Ismi, Hayatul “Beberapa Pemikiran Hukum Dalam Menyikapi Positivisme Hukum”. Riau
Law Journal. Volume 1 Nomor 1(2017):15-30
http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v1i1.4181.
Manery, Barnabas Dumas “Makna dan Fungsi Itikad Baik Dalam Kontrak Kerja
Konstruksi”.Jurnal Sasi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura,Vol.23 Nomor 2
(2017):137-140 https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v23i2.101
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta:Prenada Media 2010.
Nurjannah, Aminuddin Ilmar, Zulkifli Aspan, “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Keputusan Majelis
Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Pemeriksaan Notaris”.Riau Law Journal. Volume 2
Nomor 2 (2018):173-186, http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v2i2.5965.
Pahlefi, Rafles dan Herlina Manik, “Klausula Pembatalan Sepihak Dalam Perjanjian
Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia”, Gorontalo Law Review Vol.2
Nomor 2 (2019): 72-80, https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v2i2.702.
Pangestu, Yogi Aditya “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pembatalan Perjanjian Pengangkutan
Sampah Antara PT. Multi Inti Guna Dengan Dinas Kebersihan Dan Pertamanan Kota
Pekanbaru Dalam Perkara No.252 PDT./2016/PN.PBR”, (Skripsi, 2019).
Siombo, Marhaeni Ria dan Nada Davinia Christalya. “Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Karena Pembatalan Perjanjian Dalam Sengketa Tanah”.Jurnal Paradigma Hukum.
Vol.7 Nomor 1 (2022): 114-131, https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v7i1.3206
Sopamena, Ronald Fadly.“Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian”, Jurnal
Batulis Civil Law Review. Vol.2 Nomor 1 (2021):1-15
https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.451.
Subekti. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta:Intermasa, 1982.
Sudikno. Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Liberty, 2008.
Sumriyah.“Cacat Kehendak (Wilsgebreken)Sebagai Upaya Pembatalan Perjanjian Dalam
Perspektif Hukum Perdata”. Jurnal Simposium Hukum. Vol.1 Nomor 1 (2019):663-
667.
Suryodiningrat, R.M. Asas-asas Hukum Perikatan. Bandung:Tarsito 1985.
Suyanto dan Ayu Sulistiya Ningsih, “Pembatalan Perjanjian Sepihak Menurut Pasal 1320
Ayat (1) KUH.Perdata Tentang Kata Sepakat Sebagai Syarat Sahnya Perjanjian”.
Jurnal Pro Hukum. Vol.7. Nomor 2 (2018): 1-12,
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license allows others to share and adapt your work, but only for non-commercial purposes and under the condition that they credit you and license their new creations under the same terms.