Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Perangkat Lunak Microsoft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.8.2.113-125Keywords:
Agreement Default Purchase OrderAbstract
The buying and selling relationship between consumers and business actors presents an engagement that results in an agreement in which both parties have a dispute which can be called performance on the agreement so as not to give rise to a dispute which can be called a dispute of default or broken promise. For example, the case between PT. Asaba Computer Center and PT. Eduspec Indonesia with a breach of contract dispute regarding the sale and purchase of software with the issuance of the East Jakarta District Court decision Number 361/PDT.G/2019/PN.Jkt.Tim. Decision on the lawsuit filed by PT. Asaba Computer Center regarding default or broken promises made by PT. Eduspec Indonesia, consumers who have made purchase orders to business actors who have agreed on the agreement that has been made, as well as the total costs and payment terms to complete all payments that have been agreed upon in the agreement that has been made, but the consumer consciously does not carry out the agreement that has been made. agreed or broken promises regarding the agreement. So the East Jakarta district court issued a decision declaring a breach of contract or broken promise to consumers.
References
A. R, Azhari. “Parameter Menentukan Perbuatan Wanprestasi Dan Penipuan Dari Suatu
Perjanjian”. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah 9. No. 3 (2020).
Daulay, Melwin Syafrizal. Mengenal Hardware, Software Dan Pengelolaan Instasi
Komputer. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2007.
Jamaludin, Jaja, Gingin Ginanjar dan Euis Teti Halimah. “Penggunaan Software Sebagai
Sumber dan Media Pembelajaran Sekolah di Masa Pandemi”. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala
Education 7, No. 1 (2021).
Kusumasari, Diana. “Apakah Purchase Order (PO) Bisa Dianggap sebagai Perjanjian?”,
Hukum Online. 16 Desember 2011. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/apakah-
purchase-order-po-bisa-dianggap-sebagai-perjanjian--lt4ed4544e20d4b/.
Maulana, Danny, Endang Prasetyawati. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Pemesanan (Purchase
Order) Yang Terlambat Terbit”. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and
Social-Political Governance 3, No. 2 (2023): 1042.
Meliala , Djaja S. Hukum Perjanjian Khusus, Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2012.
Nugroho, Arief . “Panggilan Sidang Secara Patut dalam Hukum Acara Perdata”. 8 Januari
2020. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/12944/Panggilan-Sidang-Secara-
Patut-Dalam%20Hukum-Acara-Perdata.html.
Raharjo, Handri. Hukum Perjanjian di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2009.
Satrio, J. Wanprestasi Menurut
KUHPerdata, Doktrin, Dan
Yurisprudensi. Bandung:
Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.
Subekti dan Tjitro Sudibyo. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, cetakan keempat
satu. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2014.
Yusra, Dhoni, Nelly Nilam Sari. “Analisa Atas Surat Pemesanan Barang (Purchasing
Order) Sebagai Perjanjian Jual Beli”. Lex Jurnalica 9. No. 1 (2012): 25.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Riau Law Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license allows others to share and adapt your work, but only for non-commercial purposes and under the condition that they credit you and license their new creations under the same terms.