Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Perangkat Lunak Microsoft

Authors

  • Bintang Sabda Ramadan Universitas Jember Author
  • Iswi Hariyani Universitas Jember Author
  • Pratiwi Puspitho Andini Universitas Jember Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.8.2.113-125

Keywords:

Agreement Default Purchase Order

Abstract

The buying and selling relationship between consumers and business actors presents an engagement that results in an agreement in which both parties have a dispute which can be called performance on the agreement so as not to give rise to a dispute which can be called a dispute of default or broken promise. For example, the case between PT. Asaba Computer Center and PT. Eduspec Indonesia with a breach of contract dispute regarding the sale and purchase of software with the issuance of the East Jakarta District Court decision Number 361/PDT.G/2019/PN.Jkt.Tim. Decision on the lawsuit filed by PT. Asaba Computer Center regarding default or broken promises made by PT. Eduspec Indonesia, consumers who have made purchase orders to business actors who have agreed on the agreement that has been made, as well as the total costs and payment terms to complete all payments that have been agreed upon in the agreement that has been made, but the consumer consciously does not carry out the agreement that has been made. agreed or broken promises regarding the agreement. So the East Jakarta district court issued a decision declaring a breach of contract or broken promise to consumers.

References

A. R, Azhari. “Parameter Menentukan Perbuatan Wanprestasi Dan Penipuan Dari Suatu

Perjanjian”. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah 9. No. 3 (2020).

Daulay, Melwin Syafrizal. Mengenal Hardware, Software Dan Pengelolaan Instasi

Komputer. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2007.

Jamaludin, Jaja, Gingin Ginanjar dan Euis Teti Halimah. “Penggunaan Software Sebagai

Sumber dan Media Pembelajaran Sekolah di Masa Pandemi”. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala

Education 7, No. 1 (2021).

Kusumasari, Diana. “Apakah Purchase Order (PO) Bisa Dianggap sebagai Perjanjian?”,

Hukum Online. 16 Desember 2011. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/apakah-

purchase-order-po-bisa-dianggap-sebagai-perjanjian--lt4ed4544e20d4b/.

Maulana, Danny, Endang Prasetyawati. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Pemesanan (Purchase

Order) Yang Terlambat Terbit”. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and

Social-Political Governance 3, No. 2 (2023): 1042.

Meliala , Djaja S. Hukum Perjanjian Khusus, Bandung: Nuansa Aulia, 2012.

Nugroho, Arief . “Panggilan Sidang Secara Patut dalam Hukum Acara Perdata”. 8 Januari

2020. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/12944/Panggilan-Sidang-Secara-

Patut-Dalam%20Hukum-Acara-Perdata.html.

Raharjo, Handri. Hukum Perjanjian di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2009.

Satrio, J. Wanprestasi Menurut

KUHPerdata, Doktrin, Dan

Yurisprudensi. Bandung:

Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.

Subekti dan Tjitro Sudibyo. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, cetakan keempat

satu. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2014.

Yusra, Dhoni, Nelly Nilam Sari. “Analisa Atas Surat Pemesanan Barang (Purchasing

Order) Sebagai Perjanjian Jual Beli”. Lex Jurnalica 9. No. 1 (2012): 25.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Perangkat Lunak Microsoft. (2025). Riau Law Journal, 8(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.8.2.113-125