Legal Analysis of Self-Preferencing Conducted by Marketplace on Courier Services Based on Anti-Monopoly Law and Unfair Business Competition

Authors

  • Samariadi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30652/jy04jf58

Keywords:

self-preferencing, e-commerce, competition, KPPU

Abstract

The rapid development of e-commerce has positioned marketplaces as dominant players within the digital economy, while simultaneously giving rise to complex competition issues, one of which is the practice of self-preferencing. This article analyzes the legal implications of self-preferencing practices carried out by marketplaces in Indonesia, particularly the tendency to prioritize or grant exclusive advantages to affiliated or self-owned courier services. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study examines the extent to which such practices may violate Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition (the Anti-Monopoly Law), specifically with regard to abuse of dominant position, discriminatory conduct, and exclusive dealing arrangements. The findings reveal that self-preferencing may hinder fair competition in the courier service sector, disadvantage independent courier providers, restrict consumer choice, and potentially stifle innovation. Such practices create entry barriers for new market entrants and unjustly reinforce marketplace dominance. Accordingly, it is imperative for the Indonesia Competition Commission (KPPU) to proactively monitor and take enforcement actions against self-preferencing practices in order to safeguard a fair and balanced competitive environment in the digital marketplace and promote consumer welfare and market efficiency.

References

Abdulkadir, Muhammad, 2004. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti.

Gellhorn, Ernest and William E. Kovacic, 1994. Antitrust Law and Economics in a Nutshell. Minnesota: West Publishing Co.

Mukti, Fajar., & Yulianto, Achmad. 2010. “Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris” Yogyakarta:Pustaka Pelajar.

Purbo, Onno W., Aang Arif Wahyudi, 2001. Mengenal e-commerce (Bab I). Jakarta: Alex Media Komputindo.

Puspaningrum, Galuh, 2013. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Perjanjian dan Kegiatan yang Dilarang dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, Aswaja Pressindo, Yogyakarta.

Rokan, Mushtapa Khamal., 2010. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia, Depok : Raja Grafindo Persada.

Usman, Rachmadi., 2013. Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Zainuddin, Ali. 2017. Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2017.

Cindy Aulia Khotimah & Jeumpa Crisan Chairunnisa, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli-Online (E-commerce). Business Law Review, 1, (2016).

Hotana, M. S. (2018). Industri e-commerce dalam menciptakan pasar yang kompetitif berdasarkan hukum persaingan usaha. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 1(1).

Rezmia Febrina, Persaingan Usaha pada Era Digital Menurut Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Multidisiplin (JURKIM) Vol. 2, No. 1 januari 2022

Zulfa, N., Millah, N., Nuratin, N., & Novitasari, K. (2024). Konsep Maqashid Syariah dalam Praktik Strategi Pemasaran Tiktok dengan Landasan Etika Bisnis Islam. Journal of Accounting, Management, Economics, and Business (ANALYSIS), 2(1).

Asian Development Bank. (2021). Digital Transformation in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges. Diakses dari https://www.adb.org/publications/digital-transformation-indonesia-opportunities-challenges

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). (2021). Digital Platform Services Inquiry – Final Report. Diakses dari https://www.accc.gov.au/focus-areas/digital-platform-services/digital-platform-services-inquiry-2020-2025

Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). (2022). The Digital Economy in Indonesia: Opportunities and Regulatory Challenges.

Competition Commission of Singapore (CCCS). (2022). Annual Report 2021-2022. Diakses dari https://www.cccs.gov.sg/ (Cari laporan tahunan CCCS yang membahas kasus atau prioritas penegakan hukum).

Danang Sugianto, “Daftar 10 Jagoan E-commerce di Indonesia”, https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-5735421/daftar-10-jagoan-e-commerce-diindonesia, diakses pada 10 Juli 2025

European Commission. (2020). Digital Services Act package: fact-sheet on the Digital Markets Act (DMA). Diakses dari https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_20_2348

Databoks. 2024. Shopee Dominasi Pasar E-Commerce Asia Tenggara Pada 2023. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/teknologi-telekomunikasi/statistik/66989de7b7168/shopee-dominasi-pasar-e-commerce-asia-tenggara-pada-2023 akses pada 11 Juli 2025

Hukum Online. 2024. Akui Melanggar, Shopee dan Shopee Express Terima Poin-poin Perubahan Perilaku dari KPPU. Diakses dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/akui-melanggar--shopee-dan-shopee-express-terima-poin-poin-perubahan-perilaku-dari-kppu-lt667bf14749e74/

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia, https://ditjenpdn.kemendag.go.id/berita/forum-kemitraan-umkm-dengan-ritel-modern-dan-marketplace-di-bandung#:~:text=hingga%20akhir%202023.-,Bank%20Indonesia%20(BI)%20mencatat%2C%20nilai%20transaksi%20e%2Dcommerce,e%2Dcommerce%20sepanjang%20tahun%20lalu. Tanggal akses pada 10 Juli 2025

Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU). (2024). KPPU Selidiki Shopee Terkait Dugaan Praktik Diskriminasi Jasa Pengiriman. Diakses dari https://www.kppu.go.id/berita/kppu-selidiki-shopee-terkait-dugaan-praktik-diskriminasi-jasa-pengiriman-46325

Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC). (2023). Annual Report 2022. Diakses dari https://www.mycc.gov.my/

OECD. (2018). Market Studies and the Digital Economy. OECD Publishing, Paris. Diakses dari https://www.oecd.org/competition/market-studies-and-the-digital-economy-2018.pdf

OECD. (2021). The Digitalisation of Competition Policy. OECD Publishing, Paris. Diakses dari https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/the-digitalisation-of-competition-policy.htm

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 44 Tahun 2021 tentang Pelaksanaan Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

Putusan KPPU No. 04/KPPU/L/2022 tentang Dugaan Pelanggaran Pasal 15 ayat (2) dan Pasal 19 huruf a dan c UU No. 5 Tahun 1999.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-03

How to Cite

Legal Analysis of Self-Preferencing Conducted by Marketplace on Courier Services Based on Anti-Monopoly Law and Unfair Business Competition. (2025). Riau Law Journal, 9(2), 116-131. https://doi.org/10.30652/jy04jf58