Efektivitas Putusan KPPU dalam Mencegah Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30652/qznjyc24Abstract
Monopolistic practices and unfair business competition constitute serious challenges to the national economic system, as they undermine market efficiency, harm public interests, and create inequality among business actors. To prevent and address such practices, the Indonesian government established the Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) as an independent institution authorized to enforce competition law. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Decision Number 03/KPPU-I/2024 in preventing monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, as well as to assess the extent to which the decision provides legal certainty and deterrent effects for business actors. This research employs a normative legal research method using a statutory approach and a case approach. The data consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are analyzed qualitatively. The analysis focuses on the legal reasoning of the Commission Panel, the assessment of evidentiary elements, and the administrative sanctions imposed in Decision Number 03/KPPU-I/2024. The findings indicate that Decision Number 03/KPPU-I/2024 has, in principle, fulfilled the elements of competition law enforcement as stipulated in Law Number 5 of 1999. The legal considerations applied by the Commission Panel reflect an effort to uphold the principles of fair competition and protect public interests. However, the effectiveness of the decision in preventing monopolistic practices and unfair business competition remains limited, particularly in relation to the enforcement of sanctions and the level of compliance by business actors. Therefore, strengthening the execution mechanism of KPPU decisions and enhancing institutional coordination with the judiciary are necessary to improve the effectiveness of competition law enforcement in Indonesia.
References
Marlina Elisabeth Pakpahan dkk, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Pemberian Kredit Secara Digitalisasi Kepada Debitur Masa Perkembangan Financial Technology (Fintech)’, JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 2022
Populinanda, Langga, I Made Sarjana, and I Made Dedy Priyanto, ‘Google Play Billing Monopoly in Digital Media Era from the Law’s Perspective’, in Proceeding of Creative and Collaborative Communication Conference (CCOMM), 2023, I, 103–18
Tanjaya, Willy, Jessica Juliana Simalango, Roiman Simalango, and Emir Syarif Fatahillah Pakpahan, ‘Peran Pemerintah Terhadap Bisnis Online Dan UMKM Era Covid-19 Berdasarkan Hukum Positif’, Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 15.01 (2022), pp. 22–31
Zulkifli, Suhaila, Jeremia Maruli Simbolon, Mutiara Henramawati Christin Waruwu, Deviana Br Haloho, and Tajuddin Noor, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Barang Yang Hilang Atau Rusak Pada Aplikasi Jual Beli Secara Online’, Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4.2 (2023), pp. 255–61
Fitri Novia Heriani, ‘Pelaku Usaha Apresiasi Putusan KPPU Terkait Google’, Januari 2025 <https://www.hukumonline.com.>
Dewi Clara Tungga, ‘Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Google Dalam Perjanjian Penetapan Sistem Google Play Billing’, Skripsi (Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana, 2024).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dian Nukhidah Zurny, Rodiatun Adawiyah, Muhammad Arif Prasetyo (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license allows others to share and adapt your work, but only for non-commercial purposes and under the condition that they credit you and license their new creations under the same terms.


